Pokemon Server Archive

PvP Server => Moderator/Admins => Server Positions => Admin Meetings => Topic started by: Paradox on July 25, 2013, 08:53:33 pm

Title: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: Paradox on July 25, 2013, 08:53:33 pm


Tactic has been demoted due to inactivity. Once he has come back and can prove commitment to the server, we will evaluate promoting him.


Implement rpg plugin: http://www.pokemonserver.net/forum/index.php?topic=3614.msg49846#msg49846 (http://www.pokemonserver.net/forum/index.php?topic=3614.msg49846#msg49846)


VIP rooms can no longer have co-owners


xenvz will be tempbanned for a week. This is the last official warning.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: oddy on July 25, 2013, 08:55:26 pm
What RPG plugin
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: Paradox on July 25, 2013, 08:59:01 pm
My bad, should be correct now.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: Sweaty on July 25, 2013, 10:59:14 pm
Aw Tac's been a mod for so long. Although he has been gone a lot, hopefully he gets on more.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: ~Ali~ on July 26, 2013, 12:18:03 am
Aw Tac's been a mod for so long. Although he has been gone a lot, hopefully he gets on more.

Definitely. He has actual reasons for his inactivity, so I hope he can get back his place as mod.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: 1cec0ld on July 26, 2013, 01:56:54 am
He has actual reasons for his inactivity


Hence, I would have been against that decision, but no one texted/asked me.


We were also against the RPG trading plugin about a month ago, not sure what changed there.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: oddy on July 26, 2013, 02:21:13 am

Hence, I would have been against that decision, but no one texted/asked me.


We were also against the RPG trading plugin about a month ago, not sure what changed there.
That^


Who was even at this meeting
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: Tenebrae on July 26, 2013, 04:07:59 am
I also agree with 1ce. Had I been there I would not have been in favour of Tactic being demoted, despite his current inactivity. He has his reason, and we must respect that.

Who was even at this meeting

Para and Mio only I assume.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: WaffleDoc on July 26, 2013, 06:54:48 am
Aw Tac's been a mod for so long. Although he has been gone a lot, hopefully he gets on more.
I listend to the meeting and they said when he becomes fully active again he can try to get his spot back
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: ~Ali~ on July 26, 2013, 07:00:36 am
I listend to the meeting and they said when he becomes fully active again he can try to get his spot back


We understand that, but the problem is that he shouldn't have been demoted at all. Also, that it was a spontaneous act that should have been discussed beforehand.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: Okieskinny on July 26, 2013, 09:33:00 am
Para and Mio only I assume.
Shouldn't we have more than two admins voting on the demotion of a moderator and the approval of a fairly big plugin? ???
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: oddy on July 26, 2013, 03:28:41 pm
Shouldn't we have more than two admins voting on the demotion of a moderator and the approval of a fairly big plugin? ???
i vote to undo tactics demotion and the instalation of the plugin 1ce, tene. Opinions?
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: Tenebrae on July 26, 2013, 05:03:10 pm
i vote to undo tactics demotion and the instalation of the plugin 1ce, tene. Opinions?


I'm in favour of undoing Tactic's demotion, but why not give this trade plugin a week of trial?
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: oddy on July 26, 2013, 06:51:06 pm
I'm in favour of undoing Tactic's demotion, but why not give this trade plugin a week of trial?
in admin thread
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: LilWaffles on July 26, 2013, 08:38:27 pm
Yeah, I say you give Tactic his position back. He had reasons. And yeah, doesn't it have to be 3 or more admins to make a decision? There was only two.
Title: Re: 7/25/2013 Discussion
Post by: oddy on July 26, 2013, 08:48:12 pm
And yeah, doesn't it have to be 3 or more admins to make a decision? There was only two.
since we all weren't able to be there so they can continue business as usual any issue absent admins have with decisions made can be re discussed, which we are in the process of