Pokemon Server Archive

PvP Server => Server Talk => Topic started by: 1cec0ld on December 02, 2012, 03:48:32 pm

Title: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: 1cec0ld on December 02, 2012, 03:48:32 pm
Code: [Select]
Damage:
    - 'if attacker_tag_%{target_name}kill > 4':
        - 'if damage > target_health':
            - '0'
            - 'cancel'

Death:
    - 'if attacker.is.player':
        - 'if target.is.player':
            - 'tag.attacker.%{target_name}kill': '+1'

Now I could write this, and stop yall from killing the same person 5 times in one day. It would fuck a lot of shit up though, like gym battles.
Figure out how to stop trolling people who don't want to be hunted down every second of every day, or prepare for the gayest edit I've ever made to the server.
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Shane on December 02, 2012, 04:43:21 pm
Don't you dare or I will;
(https://www.pokemonserver.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lfqn2yvkkJ1qduemx.gif&hash=58f9ac0ce7fa064e7647e6b0208daa33)
(https://www.pokemonserver.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifsforum.com%2Fimages%2Fgif%2Ffuk%2520you%2Fgrand%2Ftumblr_ls93azkGdX1qm4igq.gif&hash=28961b85e4ef9b122f379a3f37d3e7f8)
(https://www.pokemonserver.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m8o0vr5MNy1ro7opk.gif&hash=f6838488f301778042e2ba35d6fbd25a)
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Mariofighter3 on December 02, 2012, 06:44:18 pm
Rule 5 was idiotic from the start and was just a way for noobs to an unfair advantage at the PvP of the server. We don't even use it anymore, so no use enforcing it again.
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: oddy on December 02, 2012, 06:51:58 pm
Rule 5 was idiotic from the start and was just a way for noobs to an unfair advantage at the PvP of the server. We don't even use it anymore, so no use enforcing it again.
it's a way for people who don't want to be camped whenever they're trying to go get some iron to actually gather resources, or make their way through mt moon, it's ignored most of the time because people go into pvp wars willingly which is where rule 5 is null and void, outside of that and official battles, wager matches, etc. it should be followed
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Mariofighter3 on December 02, 2012, 09:00:13 pm
it's a way for people who don't want to be camped whenever they're trying to go get some iron to actually gather resources, or make their way through mt moon, it's ignored most of the time because people go into pvp wars willingly which is where rule 5 is null and void, outside of that and official battles, wager matches, etc. it should be followed

Not really... It's a PvP server. That's limiting the PvP, which seems redundant. And the wilds are barely spots for battles anymore, so they can go out without being killed. So, is there really an issue? Just let the rule go.

Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Tenebrae on December 02, 2012, 09:12:35 pm
Not really... It's a PvP server. That's limiting the PvP, which seems redundant. And the wilds are barely spots for battles anymore, so they can go out without being killed. So, is there really an issue? Just let the rule go.
Sure its limiting, but you don't want to be killed each time you go into a pvp zone. Doesn't just apply to the wilderness, but the main map too. I've never been one to kill newly joined people...
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Okieskinny on December 02, 2012, 10:12:17 pm
Enforcing this would make things a million times easier for new players when people with a decent axes stat goes on a rampage, but what happens if a person challenges a gym and loses more than 5 times?
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Mariofighter3 on December 02, 2012, 10:25:30 pm
Sure its limiting, but you don't want to be killed each time you go into a pvp zone. Doesn't just apply to the wilderness, but the main map too. I've never been one to kill newly joined people...

I know it applies everywhere, but have you seen any camping lately? Our new players have been free without concern of players killing them for awhile now, so do we still need a rule that then worked but now is just limiting?
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Anonymouslyanon on December 02, 2012, 10:45:14 pm
Not the players that take Route 22 ("Victory Road") to get to Johto. :P
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Rigby on December 02, 2012, 11:13:17 pm
OHOHOHOH.
RIGBY'S IDEA ISN'T SO BAD NOW, IS IT?








Yeah. Fuck rule 5.
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: 1cec0ld on December 02, 2012, 11:21:49 pm
OHOHOHOH.
RIGBY'S IDEA ISN'T SO BAD NOW, IS IT?

Yeah. Fuck rule 5.

What idea?


Mario, the reason I posted this was because of camping and hunting a specific player. I wouldn't have brought up the subject otherwise.
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: shishkabob97 on December 04, 2012, 11:29:25 pm
Not the players that take Route 22 ("Victory Road") to get to Johto. :P
Lol I'll take blame for that one
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Mariofighter3 on December 05, 2012, 07:31:14 am
Lol I'll take blame for that one

It was more or less Draco.
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: LilacLily on December 05, 2012, 11:34:27 am
Why does VR have PvP enabled in the first place...
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: ArchieSalt on December 05, 2012, 01:12:29 pm
I dont really see the problem, PvP in the wild has been shit ever since the admins made warps to areas in the wilderness and disabled PvP in the first couple of routes. That was the funnest part of the server and it made the quote  'It's dangerous to go in tall grass' TRUE. In my eyes the admins should enable PvP in all routes to make the server more PvP oriented and fun - just place warning signs everywhere or something.
I dont' see why all enjoyment should grind to a halt because a couple of newbies who will probably never play on the server again cannot handle getting killed.
Title: Re: Do I need to enforce Rule 5?
Post by: Equin0x on December 05, 2012, 05:10:28 pm
It should be enforced, but not limited to 5. When I first joined last year we had the freedom of pvp'ing in routes. Sure it was fun, but certain people took advantage and what happened? The dreaded route 2. No one was able to pass route 2 or even get to Pewter City because of the amount of camping that went on. People like creeper_hugger and others would just sit down on a tree on route 2 and just wait for their next victim, no matter who it was. It was like if these people were trying to get a nuke on call of duty, the amount of killing sprees the new players had to endure was ridiculous. Now you may say PvP like that isn't much of a problem, but why is that? It's being prevented. I would bet any amount of money that if the routes were to ever be unlocked again, the same thing would happen, maybe even worst. And to my knowledge, the admins weren't aiming to make this a PvP server, it used to be a more RPG'ish ish ish ish, with the normal Pokemon adventure and socialness but now 'a days all I ever see in suggestions it PVP PVP MOAR PVP. It's like if it's not a actual Pokemon server but a PvP server ontop of a Pokemon map. That's how I see it. Almost forgot! My vote on this predicament is wait a couple days/weeks if you still see an enforcement should be in effect, put it. But instead of 5 raise it a bit higher.


Perfect idea just pooped out!
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.