Pokemon Server Archive

PvP Server => Suggestions => Topic started by: cabass on August 17, 2012, 07:05:35 pm

Title: new ranks
Post by: cabass on August 17, 2012, 07:05:35 pm
These are a list that people have asked me about and i will pool them al  together in this thread.

[POKEMON] (different colors based on type they want(ex. [POKEMON] = Fire Type)- this rank can just be asked for by any player and then they will ask for a type. Then they will roam until they are caught.
The types of these should be as follows:
You can also use [P] in front of there name for this.

If anyone wants a new rank post it here and i will integrate it into this first post.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Mariofighter3 on August 17, 2012, 07:07:21 pm
We had an idea like this already...


and the Admins denied it.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: cabass on August 17, 2012, 07:13:39 pm
I dont care the can deny this but at least I have sad cause at least 20 people asked me for this rank
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Okieskinny on August 17, 2012, 07:16:50 pm
Declined before because of something like this happening: [J][F]Gymleader. In other words really freaking complicated titles, and also remember the title is trainer, trainers don't have types. :p
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: cabass on August 17, 2012, 07:29:30 pm
first, what is [F]
second, it is a fair idea
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Okieskinny on August 17, 2012, 07:33:22 pm
first, what is [F]
second, it is a fair idea
Fire type
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: cabass on August 17, 2012, 07:59:22 pm
No it could be it own rank so INSTEAD of trainer
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Prodigy39 on August 17, 2012, 08:02:42 pm
I won't even bother with this. All I have to say is this idea is stupid and complecated.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: cabass on August 17, 2012, 08:15:02 pm
gee thanks that comment made me feel good
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Ichikunjii on August 17, 2012, 08:20:59 pm
Suggestions are suggestion positive or negative. Thats why there are these suggestions so we can respond with what we think about them.

Ehh I don't like it either. Its not really useful if it doesn't do much.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: liquidfired on August 17, 2012, 08:25:42 pm
Complicated and annoying to input. It doesn't do much but change your tag, but however it will confuse a lot of 10 year old children.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Tenebrae on August 18, 2012, 04:23:46 am
Complicated and annoying to input. It doesn't do much but change your tag, but however it will confuse a lot of 10 year old children.


Also, people are fine roleplaying as is. I dont see the need to introduce unnecessary ranks such as these.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: tnguyen1 on August 30, 2012, 11:05:54 pm
These are a list that people have asked me about and i will pool them al  together in this thread.

[POKEMON] (different colors based on type they want(ex. [POKEMON] = Fire Type)- this rank can just be asked for by any player and then they will ask for a type. Then they will roam until they are caught.
The types of these should be as follows:
  • [POKEMON] = Fire
  • [POKEMON] = Electric
  • [POKEMON] = Psychic
  • [POKEMON] = Grass
  • [POKEMON] = Ground
  • [POKEMON] = Poison
  • [POKEMON] = Water
  • [POKEMON] = Rock
  • [POKEMON] = Dragon
  • [POKEMON] = Ice
  • [POKEMON] = Fight
You can also use [P] in front of there name for this.

If anyone wants a new rank post it here and i will integrate it into this first post.
You think an admin are going to make this well i say no because this take too much color and it would be annoying if people talk in chat with these rank when there are million different color and newb that are new don't know what you are so yeah idk what i am saying but it a bad idea to have this thats all MEOW!
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: LilacLily on August 31, 2012, 08:06:44 am
I, for one, think its a great idea, even if it IS complicated.
BUT.
what happens if theres a [POKEMON] with multiple types? E.G. Psychic/Flying
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: zekrom74 on August 31, 2012, 09:42:55 am
I, for one, think its a great idea, even if it IS complicated.
BUT.
what happens if theres a [POKEMON] with multiple types? E.G. Psychic/Flying
Another Hanzo has risen. :trollface:
I already suggested this a few months ago, they said it might be a bad idea...
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: LilacLily on August 31, 2012, 12:55:00 pm
i am nothing like hanzo.
Case Closed.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: tnguyen1 on August 31, 2012, 06:42:18 pm
I, for one, think its a great idea, even if it IS complicated.
BUT.
what happens if theres a [POKEMON] with multiple types? E.G. Psychic/Flying
Lilac its already a bad idea since of the color and people who want these damn rank is like FUCKING CONFUSED ON WHO IS WHICH
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Tenebrae on August 31, 2012, 07:06:45 pm
Players are confused enough with [J][Trainer] and [J][GymLeader]. More ranks will come with the release of the other regions in the [hopefully] coming months...
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Anonymouslyanon on August 31, 2012, 07:42:36 pm
On another topic, why not just make the gym leader requirements 4 kanto badges, so that there isn't a need for  [J][GymLeader]?
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: Tenebrae on August 31, 2012, 07:53:14 pm
On another topic, why not just make the gym leader requirements 4 kanto badges, so that there isn't a need for  [J][GymLeader]?
Maybe they'll abolish the [J] tag altogether if another region is opened. Then the requirements for Johto could be lowered, making room for more people and new leaders in new regions. Without increasing Kanto gym requirements, 4 badges could be reasonable.
Title: Re: new ranks
Post by: XxWicked_PnutxX on October 13, 2012, 07:08:31 pm
I Think This Idea Will Just Confuse New Players, How Ever This Would Work Alot better If The Server Was More On the Roleplaying Side Of Things.